Skip to main content

Firefox hits the jackpot with almost billion dollar Google deal


Mozilla s Firefoxes are winning with new Google deal
Mozilla's Firefoxes are winning with the new Google deal
Well, Mozilla certainly fooled us. Just when we were counting Firefox out as a major Web browser player in the years ahead. Sure, Mozilla signed a new deal with Google, but by itself though many of us didn’t think the deal meant much. I assumed, along with many others, that Google could support Firefox with its pocket change while devoting all its real attention to its own Web browser: Chrome. Boy, were we wrong!
We now know that Google will pay just under $300 million per year to be Firefox’s default search engine choice. That’s almost three-times as much as Mozilla made in its previous deal with Google. In 2010, 84% of Mozilla’s $123 million in revenue came from its Google search deal.
This is great for Mozilla. As Jay Lyman, senior open-source analyst for 451 Research, said this is “certainly good news for Mozilla and Firefox and it buys them more time to find other sources of revenue beyond Google’s search advertising. However, that has long been and continues to be a challenge. At the same time, Firefox and Mozilla are facing intense competition on all fronts, particularly from Google with Chrome. Mozilla’s wise moves toward mobile computing may be intensified or expedited, but the organization faces significant competitors there too.”
For now though, it’s all good for Mozilla. We don’t know how the details of how Mozilla almost tripled its income were hammered out yet, but we do know that Mozilla played Google off against both Microsoft and Yahoo. While both search giants will still be listed as options for Firefox, the all important default search engine will remain Google.
So why did Google spend this much on a “rival?” We don’t know that either. But, if Google can, with Firefox’s help, push Microsoft’s Internet Explorer out of the top Web browser spot, they wouldn’t cry. What’s more important to Google’s bottom line is that by making sure that Google is the number one choice on two of the big three Web browsers it helps to ensure that Bing and Yahoo stay in a distant second place in the search engine market race.
Now the question is: What will Mozilla do with its new-found riches? A good guess, to borrow Microsoft’s Steve Ballmer’s favorite phrase, is: “Developers! Developers! Developers!”
In the last three years, Mozilla has ratcheted up its software development spending enormously. The Software Development line in Mozilla’s financials reads:
  • 2008: $31.3 million
  • 2009: $40.2 million
  • 2010: $62.8 million
But where exactly will this money go? Mozilla has declined to answer my queries, but given their recent work, it’s not too hard to guess where their money will go.
First, Mozilla has been pushing out Firefox releases at a dizzying pace. And, as the emergency bug fix release of Firefox 9.01 just showed, sometimes Mozilla has been releasing their flagship Web browser too fast for its users own good. With more resources, Mozilla can, and should, do a better job of quality assurance.
At the same time, Mozilla has recently redesigned its Firefox Web browser for Android. With the rise of smartphones and tablets, it makes perfect sense for Mozilla to spend even more resources on delivering a first rate Web browser performance on Android and Apple’s iOS.
So, what I expect to see is stronger Web browsers on the PC and additional innovation for the growing smartphone and tablet market. I see Mozilla and Google both winning from this deal. For what still amounts to little money for Google, the search giant put more pressure on Microsoft and Mozilla gets more money than the company has ever seen before. Microsoft is the big loser, but Yahoo and all the smaller Web browser companies can’t be happy either.

With $300-million a year in revenue from Google, Firefox is going to stay a major Web browser player. The big loser? Microsoft.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Source for Posts

Disclaimer: Majority of the posts are copied from online sources like RCR Wireless , etc. No copyright infringement intended. Almost all data is taken from various website sources. However for some of the inital posts posted following are there links: 1. http://www.rcrwireless.com/article/20110818/CARRIERS/110819938/-1/report-inactive-customers-nearly-30-of-indias-base?elq=1d0c17a4f1504f139289bf04ac5805a7&elqCampaignId=220 2.  http://www.rcrwireless.com/article/20110817/CARRIERS/110819954/-1/verizon-covers-more-than-half-of-us-popluation-with-latest-lte?elq=cfd506910d97404bbb3e2decb0593ba9&elqCampaignId=215 3. http://www.rcrwireless.com/article/20110802/CARRIERS/110809992/-1/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=item&utm_campaign=rss&elq=ba26a47b36674a7c84eb641a3043c7d2&elqCampaignId=185   4. http://www.rcrwireless.com/article/20110801/ENTERPRISE/110809997/-1/american-express-taps-carrier-no-2-for-digital-commerce-platform?elq=7d6d901059a4417ca5fd7...

Road to Network Cloudification: Europe

Road to Network Cloudification: Europe This is the 4th post part of the " Road to Network Cloudification " series where our focus is on summarizing the virtualization journey so far, status & 5G related news of some of the major Operators in the region being discussed. In the earlier articles we have looked at US,Canada , India & UK . The hyperlinks will take to the post of the respective regions. In this post we will be looking into some of the major operators for rest of the Europe Region .   Note: As of 21st August, 2020 have started a new post with summary table capturing all regions, the operators from these post and their NFV ecosystem and 5G status.  URL: https://matelecom.blogspot.com/2020/08/road-to-network-cloudification-summary-table.html    Last Updated: 4th January 2022.

Telefónica to deploy LTE in 2.6Ghz

Spain’s Telefónica announced LTE deployment at Mobile World Congress , saying it will use Alcatel Lucent’s LightRadio technology in the 2.6Ghz frequency band. Deployment is expected to begin in Chile and Brazil. According to the company, the service will provide download speeds of 100 Mbps, and between 40-60Mbps on upload. Telefónica explained that the difference in its deployment is that in the conventional deployment, radio base stations co-exist with 4G metro cells (small base stations incorporating antennas and radio) working on the same frequency and with no interference. During the announcement, Telefónica highlighted as the most significant feature the increased capacity to support 30 people browsing simultaneously with an average speed of 30Mbps. The telecom operator noted that the network supports speeds of up to 10 times those offered by the 3G network, with download speeds of 100Mbps, upload speeds of 40-60 Mbps and with latency times of around 20-25 mi...